The <i>Bundesverfassungsgericht’</i>s Glaring and Deliberate Breaches of EU Law Based on ‘Unintelligible’ and ‘Arbitrary’ Grounds

The authors believe that the judgment of German Federal Constitutional Court contains serious breaches EU law and is manifestly erroneous. judges refuse to apply CJEU’s arrogate power assess legality European Central Bank (ECB) decisions review reasoning CJEU, which they qualify as being ‘unintelligible arbitrary’ for sole purpose declaring it ‘ultra vires’. They use principle proportionality in a legally incorrect way, ignoring difference scope between latter conferral. make highly questionable democracy economic analysis merits ECB decisions. A careful leads us wish initiation an infringement procedure. Breach by judiciary conferral, democratic principle, dialogue courts, competences, procedure, manifest error, primacy, proportionality, ultravires